<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Castiglione &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ccastig.com/tag/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ccastig.com</link>
	<description>Chris Castiglione, New Media, Development, Music, University of Amsterdam, New York City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Securing Internet Freedom &#8211; Milton Mueller (short summary)</title>
		<link>http://www.ccastig.com/2008/12/22/securing-internet-freedom-milton-mueller-short-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ccastig.com/2008/12/22/securing-internet-freedom-milton-mueller-short-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Castiglione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thinking_aloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccastig.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Securing Internet Freedom is a short thirty-page essay by Milton Mueller that I received at Fifi 2008. 1. The Dream Mueller begins by killing off the dream of the Internet as a free and utopic device. He believes that the list of infringements to our freedoms is getting too long defend ourselves from: &#8220;For every [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:NUBcPQm3ghAJ:bastard-inc.nl/pdf/MM-oratie-final.pdf+%22securing+internet+freedom%22+mueller&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=3&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank">Securing Internet Freedom</a> is a short thirty-page essay by Milton Mueller that I received at <a href="http://www.ccastig.com/2008/11/28/244/" target="_blank">Fifi 2008</a>.</p>
<p>1. The Dream<br />
Mueller begins by killing off the dream of the Internet as a free and utopic device. He believes that the list of infringements to our freedoms is getting too long defend ourselves from: &#8220;For every innovation, there is an impostor&#8230;and we cannot escape it because it is invading our pockets through our mobile telephones.&#8221; &#8220;As long as we cling to that fallacy we will lose what is worth keeping about the original dream,&#8221; says Mueller.  Therefore, we need to redefine what we mean by &#8220;Internet freedom&#8221;. (13)</p>
<p>2. Rights<br />
&#8220;The relationships between privacy, security and freedom are double-edged&#8221;, explains Mueller. An excess or lack of privacy or security can sacrifice our freedoms. Mueller concludes that &#8220;One cannot talk sensibly, much less scientifically, about privacy and security on the Internet without grounding the discussion in a commitment to clearly defined individual rights.&#8221; Therefore, we need to begin with a discussion of individual rights so that we can avoid messy inconsistencies where the law attempts to justify rights based on whim or group circumstance. More to the point: freedom needs to come first.</p>
<p>3. Order<br />
Mueller contrasts the writings of Lawrence Lessig and Friedrich Hayek to exemplify how we might begin to discuss the laws and institutions necessary for building freedom on the web.  Lessig&#8217;s &#8220;code is law&#8221; implies the hierarchical influence of information technology over the user, or as Mueller has paraphrased: &#8220;code and law express the power of some people over others&#8221;. Hayek, on the other hand, uses the example of language and patterns of grammar to exhibit that these &#8220;rules and conventions are constraints&#8221;, while at the same time the rules of language enable freedom. Mueller sides with Hayek&#8217;s model and adds that the code of TCP/IP was law in Hayek&#8217;s sense of the laws of language, and not Lessig&#8217;s hierarchical law.</p>
<p>4. Institutions<br />
Institutionalism is Mueller&#8217;s social science approach in his research that refers not to the organizations, but to the rules and roles of individual actors. Here he addresses two major problem issues: (1) the problem of nation-state vs. global governance and (2) the responsibility ofISPs. Mueller also questions the ISPs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ccastig.com/2008/12/22/securing-internet-freedom-milton-mueller-short-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

